27 May 2026
Urgent need for one-stop mineral rights shop, Minerals Council points out
Mining Weekly Audio Articles
About
This audio is brought to you by Endress and Hauser, a global leader in process and laboratory measurement technology, offering a broad portfolio of instruments, solutions and services for industrial process measurement and automation.
There is an urgent need for a one-stop shop for mineral right applications to coordinate and align all relevant regulations from other departments, to streamline and expedite approval processes.
This was pointed out explicitly at the 136th annual general meeting (AGM) of Minerals Council South Africa on Wednesday, May 27.
"The prevailing fragmented system results in delays and lost opportunities. A shared vision in the government of the importance of mining and the role it plays in our economy and society is essential," Minerals Council President Paul Dunne explained at the AGM covered by Mining Weekly.
The AGM came together during one of the most important moments in recent years for the South African mining sector with a fundamental sea change underway as the Department of Mineral and Petroleum Resources (DMPR) is further revising the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act , which was gazetted 22 years ago in April 2004.
South Africa had, Dunne said, a long history of robust engagements in policy developments with the DMPR, with moments of positive outcome, but also moments of disagreements ending up in court.
"These were unnecessary developments that damaged sentiment and perceptions of South Africa as a mining investment destination, and which, we trust, will never be repeated," Dunne stated.
Since 2004, South African mining had operated under the Mining Charter, which had positioned the mining sector as one of the country's most transformed economic clusters.
The Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act marked a profound change in the way mining operated by vesting all unmined minerals in the custodianship of the State, ending private mineral ownership.
It ensured the participation of all South Africans who were previously excluded from full participation in one of South Africa's most important industrial clusters.
It ensured that companies looked beyond their mine gates to uplift communities through investments and partnerships, and to create fairer, more equitable and inclusive workplaces.
Around the time it was gazetted, women representation in mining, which is now at 21%, was around 3%, with mining companies meeting or exceeding economic empowerment ownership targets.
"It's unfortunate, however, that while the Act has delivered profound social change and transformation in the mining sector, it has fallen short of its aspiration to create an internationally competitive and efficient administrative and regulatory regime," Dunne reported.
Mining's contribution to GDP in 2025 was 6.2%, virtually flat compared with 6.3% when the Act was gazetted in 2004.
Simply put, South African mining was not – and had not been -- growing in any meaningful way for a multitude of reasons, including electricity shortages, above-inflation energy tariffs, logistics bottlenecks, regulatory uncertainty and poor administration of the law.
The past 22 years had been marred, Dunne noted, by disputes between the regulator, and the Minerals Council and its members, which were often resolved in court.
In 2013, a Bill to amend the Act spent more than 2 000 days in various proceedings before being withdrawn amid profound unhappiness about its proposed amendments.
"The negative impact of the prolonged regulatory uncertainty that those proposed amendments caused for the mining sector must not be understated. A repetition of drawn-out wrangling, because of an ill-considered Amendment Bill, which does not reflect our engagements with the DMPR, must be avoided at all costs," Dunne urged in reference to the latest Mineral Resources Development (MRD) Bill expected later this year.
Coupled with the uncertainty caused by the previous Bill, there had been the four versions of the Mining Charter, each setting rev...
There is an urgent need for a one-stop shop for mineral right applications to coordinate and align all relevant regulations from other departments, to streamline and expedite approval processes.
This was pointed out explicitly at the 136th annual general meeting (AGM) of Minerals Council South Africa on Wednesday, May 27.
"The prevailing fragmented system results in delays and lost opportunities. A shared vision in the government of the importance of mining and the role it plays in our economy and society is essential," Minerals Council President Paul Dunne explained at the AGM covered by Mining Weekly.
The AGM came together during one of the most important moments in recent years for the South African mining sector with a fundamental sea change underway as the Department of Mineral and Petroleum Resources (DMPR) is further revising the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act , which was gazetted 22 years ago in April 2004.
South Africa had, Dunne said, a long history of robust engagements in policy developments with the DMPR, with moments of positive outcome, but also moments of disagreements ending up in court.
"These were unnecessary developments that damaged sentiment and perceptions of South Africa as a mining investment destination, and which, we trust, will never be repeated," Dunne stated.
Since 2004, South African mining had operated under the Mining Charter, which had positioned the mining sector as one of the country's most transformed economic clusters.
The Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act marked a profound change in the way mining operated by vesting all unmined minerals in the custodianship of the State, ending private mineral ownership.
It ensured the participation of all South Africans who were previously excluded from full participation in one of South Africa's most important industrial clusters.
It ensured that companies looked beyond their mine gates to uplift communities through investments and partnerships, and to create fairer, more equitable and inclusive workplaces.
Around the time it was gazetted, women representation in mining, which is now at 21%, was around 3%, with mining companies meeting or exceeding economic empowerment ownership targets.
"It's unfortunate, however, that while the Act has delivered profound social change and transformation in the mining sector, it has fallen short of its aspiration to create an internationally competitive and efficient administrative and regulatory regime," Dunne reported.
Mining's contribution to GDP in 2025 was 6.2%, virtually flat compared with 6.3% when the Act was gazetted in 2004.
Simply put, South African mining was not – and had not been -- growing in any meaningful way for a multitude of reasons, including electricity shortages, above-inflation energy tariffs, logistics bottlenecks, regulatory uncertainty and poor administration of the law.
The past 22 years had been marred, Dunne noted, by disputes between the regulator, and the Minerals Council and its members, which were often resolved in court.
In 2013, a Bill to amend the Act spent more than 2 000 days in various proceedings before being withdrawn amid profound unhappiness about its proposed amendments.
"The negative impact of the prolonged regulatory uncertainty that those proposed amendments caused for the mining sector must not be understated. A repetition of drawn-out wrangling, because of an ill-considered Amendment Bill, which does not reflect our engagements with the DMPR, must be avoided at all costs," Dunne urged in reference to the latest Mineral Resources Development (MRD) Bill expected later this year.
Coupled with the uncertainty caused by the previous Bill, there had been the four versions of the Mining Charter, each setting rev...